These findings are the result of an Invisibly survey of 500 Americans concerning Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.
This study shows that there has been a strong public reaction to Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter. The realization of the acquisition would seem to have little influence in convincing non-Twitter users to join the platform and holds limited sway over existing Twitter user’s emotions. However, for those who do feel angry or worried about the acquisition, their feelings are strong enough that they are considering a departure from the platform in the future. While this study does not confirm reasons why any of these respondents are worried or angry, one common reaction among people who have publicly expressed concern are fears that Musk’s purchase will move the United States closer to an oligarchy in which the ultra wealthy control all the major media and communication platforms. Some see Musk’s intent to purchase Twitter as a power move, rather than a move to defend free speech as Musk himself has intimated.
Despite Musk’s message regarding the protection of free speech, the majority of respondents who claim to be worried or angry about the acquisition do not feel that Twitter currently censors free speech – directly opposite of Musk’s opinion (Figure 3B). In addition, these respondents are more likely to think that with Elon Musk in charge, there will be more disinformation on the platform (Figure 4B). This may explain why they are also more likely than the average respondent to favor the implementation of a Disinformation Governance Board – which was proposed last month as part of the Department of Homeland Security (Figure 4D).
Musk pointed out in a tweet that Trump Media’s new social platform, Truth Social, was performing better than other popular apps in the iOS App Store. He also stated that Truth Social’s existence was purely because Twitter censored free speech – referring to the ban on President Trump’s Twitter account after the January 6th capitol riots. The debate lies in that Musk sees looser restrictions on Twitter as a solution that could keep everyone on one platform and stop a large population from being siloed into any particular feed or app like Truth Social, which in turn could further political polarization. On the other hand, those opposed to Musk’s takeover feel that disinformation on Twitter is a more important issue to deal with, that the company’s chosen restrictions are appropriate and just, and loosening them would perpetuate disinformation and potentially political polarization.
Campaign Insights’ Realtime Polling surveys differ from traditional online surveys in that the questions are shown to the user on web pages in place of an ad. Unlike Google Surveys, which block access to content until the questions are answered, Realtime Polling surveys are optional, thus ensuring that participants are responding voluntarily.